> > Ulf, I'd think that mmc_abort_tuning() should be named > > mmc_abort_tuning_cmd() instead. Because we don't actually abort the > > tuning as a whole in this function. What do you think? I can prepare a > > patch if you agree. > > Good point. > > I have no strong opinion, but perhaps mmc_send_abort_tuning() is more > consistent with other function names? Ack. I will prepare it!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
