On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 17:57, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:24 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If the tmio device is attached to a genpd (PM domain), that genpd may have > > ->start|stop() callback assigned to it. To make sure the device is > > accessible during ->probe(), genpd's ->start() callback must be invoked, > > which is currently managed by tmio_mmc_host_probe(). However, it's likely > > that may be too late for some cases, as registers may be read and written > > way before that point. > > > > To fix the behaviour, let's move the call to dev_pm_domain_start() from > > tmio_mmc_host_probe() into those clients that needs it. From discussions at > > linux-mmc mailing list, it turned out that it should be sufficient to do > > this for the SDHI renesas variants, hence the call is move to > > renesas_sdhi_probe(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 3 +++ > > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c | 2 -- > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c > > index ff72b381a6b3..dcba9ad35dd1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > +#include <linux/pm_domain.h> > > #include <linux/mmc/host.h> > > #include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h> > > #include <linux/mfd/tmio.h> > > @@ -905,6 +906,8 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > > /* All SDHI have SDIO status bits which must be 1 */ > > mmc_data->flags |= TMIO_MMC_SDIO_STATUS_SETBITS; > > > > + dev_pm_domain_start(&pdev->dev); > > + > > > I have debug prints at the top of genpd_stop_dev(): > > pr_info("==== %s/%s: stop\n", genpd->name, dev_name(dev)); > > and genpd_start_dev(): > > pr_info("==== %s/%s: start\n", genpd->name, dev_name(dev)); > > On Koelsch (R-Car M2-W), the three SDHI devices are started twice: > > PM: ==== always-on/ee100000.sd: start > PM: ==== always-on/ee140000.sd: start > PM: ==== always-on/ee160000.sd: start > PM: ==== always-on/ee100000.sd: start > PM: ==== always-on/ee140000.sd: start > PM: ==== always-on/ee160000.sd: start > > The first time, the probe is deferred, because the regulator needed in > tmio_mmc_init_ocr() hasn't been instantiated yet. The SDHI device is > detached from the PM domain, but not stopped. > Interestingly, I see no clock imbalances afterwards. That's because genpd's->detach_dev() callback is invoked at the "deferred probe" case. In your case this ends up calling pm_clk_destroy(). Thus the clock gets disabled and unprepared correctly. > > On R-Car Gen3, R-Mobile A1, and RZ/A systems, they are started once, > as expected. > > On R-Mobile APE6 and SH-Mobile AG5, one device is stopped and started > again: > > PM: ==== a3sp/ee100000.sd: start > PM: ==== a3sp/ee120000.sd: start > PM: ==== a3sp/ee120000.sd: stop > PM: ==== a3sp/ee120000.sd: start > > But here no probe deferral is involved. > Just Runtime PM kicking in, I guess. Yep, and that's okay, right? > > > ret = renesas_sdhi_clk_enable(host); > > if (ret) > > goto efree; > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > index ba301fb7656b..d7fde57c78c1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/pagemap.h> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > -#include <linux/pm_domain.h> > > #include <linux/pm_qos.h> > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > @@ -1192,7 +1191,6 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host) > > /* See if we also get DMA */ > > tmio_mmc_request_dma(_host, pdata); > > > > - dev_pm_domain_start(&pdev->dev); > > Before, the issue on probe deferral didn't happen, as the device was only > started after the regulator was found. I am not sure there is an issue or did I miss something? > > > pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev); > > pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev); > > pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 50); > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert Thanks a lot for testing and sharing results! Very much appreciated! Kind regards Uffe