Adrian,
On 28/11/19 2:56 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 28/11/19 10:21 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19/09/19 5:27 PM, Alan Cooper wrote:
>>> This does correct the sequence of switching to HS400 but it might be
>>> safest to just add this to the latest until it gets a little testing
>>> to make sure it doesn't expose some bug in existing controllers.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Al
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:52 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 13:51, Al Cooper <alcooperx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When switching from any MMC speed mode that requires 1.8v
>>>>> (HS200, HS400 and HS400ES) to High Speed (HS) mode, the system
>>>>> ends up configured for SDR12 with a 50MHz clock which is an illegal
>>>>> mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> This happens because the SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180 bit in the
>>>>> SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register is left set and when this bit is
>>>>> set, the speed mode is controlled by the SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field
>>>>> in the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register. The SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field
>>>>> will end up being set to 0 (SDR12) by sdhci_set_uhs_signaling()
>>>>> because there is no UHS mode being set.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix is to change sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() to set the
>>>>> SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field to SDR25 (which is the same as HS) for
>>>>> any switch to HS mode.
>>
>> This change has broken High speed mode in SD card for me in AM65x-evm. I
>> guess this change only needs to be done for eMMC. SDR25 is decidedly not
>> the same as high speed for SD card.
>
> Shall we revert c894e33ddc1910e14d6f2a2016f60ab613fd8b37 and then Alan
> could send a patch providing the desired behaviour in ->set_uhs_signaling()
> of the relevant driver e.g.
>
> void ???_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int timing)
> {
> if (timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS || timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS)
> timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25;
> sdhci_set_uhs_signaling(host, timing);
> }
>
Yes. Lets do that. I will send the revert.
Thanks,
Faiz
