On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 10:35, <Eugen.Hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > HS200 is not implemented in the driver, but the controller claims it > through caps. > Remove it via quirk. > Without this quirk, the mmc core will try to enable hs200, which will fail, > and the eMMC initialization will fail. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Should this be applied as a fix and possibly tagged for stable? In such case, do you have a specific commit that it fixes? Kind regards Uffe > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c > index 57fe3b2..3a8c6d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c > @@ -370,6 +370,9 @@ static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 50); > pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); > > + /* HS200 is broken at this moment */ > + host->quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200; > + > ret = sdhci_add_host(host); > if (ret) > goto pm_runtime_disable; > -- > 2.7.4 >
