>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As per specification, the host can use either CMD24 or CMD25 for the
> > > > FFU. CMD25 is better option as it can program the firmware image in
> one
> > > > go.
> > > >
> > > > CMD25 is enabled as optional and user can use this by giving optional
> > > > parameter '-c'.
> > > > Example: mmc ffu -c <firmware_image> <device>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Why make it optional?
> >
> > I was not sure about the reason behind using CMD24 instead of CMD25.
> >
> > > If you indeed see a considerable performance gain, just use cmd25
> instead.
> > > Can you share those improvement rates that you noticed while testing?
> >
> > The code is like below:
> >
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &start);
> > while (chunk_size > 0) {
> > ...
> > }
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &end);
> > .....
> >
> > In the case of CMD24 completion took 635msec and in the case of CMD25
> > completion took 20msec.
> Wow - Impressive....
> Did you tried running it close-ended as well?
Yes, there is not much change in these numbers.
>
> Please send a V2 without the -c, I will review it.
Which one do you prefer closed-ended or open-ended?
Thanks,
Shiva
