On 10/12/2018 8:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote:
From: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator
is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for
the required load.
Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties:
"xo" - TCXO clock (optional)
"cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
"sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
+- qcom,<supply>-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and
+ BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in
+ pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively.
+ Units uA.
Seems like something that should be common?
Hi Rob,
Can you please little elaborate your comment?
Do mean this should be common for all vendors, not specific to qcom-mmc?
Thanks,
Veera
