On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote: > From: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator > is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for > the required load. > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties: > "xo" - TCXO clock (optional) > "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > +- qcom,<supply>-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and > + BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in > + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively. > + Units uA. Seems like something that should be common?
