On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 01:42:47PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 2018-11-02 12:55:02 +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:59:44PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The driver sets an incorrect clock and depends on the clock driver > > > knowledge of this incorrect setting to still set a 200Mhz SDn clock. > > > Instead of spreading the workaround between the two drivers the clock > > > driver should be made aware of the ES versions where the special clock > > > handling is needed no need to keep this workaround in the SDHI driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Does this change cause a regression pending an update > > to the clock driver? > > No it does not, the corresponding BSP commit to the clock driver [1] was > never part of upstream. This change should never have been merged > upstream as it uses the hack from the BSP clock driver. Also HS400 have > never been enabled upstream for Gen3. > > 1. 11fca067bde0221d ("clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Fix SD divider setting") Thanks, got it. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>