On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:16 PM Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The esdhc node has some minor fixes according to the RM document.
The LX2160a related device trees are still being reviewed and not
accepted. Can we squash these fixes into the original patches?
And you should cc the arm-linux mailing list and related maintainers
for dts patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> index c213642..d3e8dad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@
> };
>
> esdhc0: esdhc@2140000 {
> - status = "disabled";
> - compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-esdhc", "fsl,esdhc";
> + compatible = "fsl,esdhc";
> reg = <0x0 0x2140000 0x0 0x10000>;
> interrupts = <0 28 0x4>; /* Level high type */
> clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
> @@ -362,18 +361,20 @@
> sdhci,auto-cmd12;
> little-endian;
> bus-width = <4>;
> + status = "disabled";
> };
>
> esdhc1: esdhc@2150000 {
> - status = "disabled";
> - compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-esdhc", "fsl,esdhc";
> + compatible = "fsl,esdhc";
> reg = <0x0 0x2150000 0x0 0x10000>;
> - interrupts = <0 28 0x4>; /* Level high type */
> + interrupts = <0 63 0x4>; /* Level high type */
> clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
> voltage-ranges = <1800 1800 3300 3300>;
> sdhci,auto-cmd12;
> + broken-cd;
> little-endian;
> bus-width = <4>;
> + status = "disabled";
> };
>
> gpio0: gpio@2300000 {
> --
> 1.7.1
>
