1;5202;0c On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:09:58AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Recent Linux versions refuse to print actual virtual kernel addresses, > to not give a hint about the location of the kernel in a randomized virtual > address space. This affects the output of the sunxi MMC controller > driver, which now produces the rather uninformative line: > > [ 1.482660] sunxi-mmc 1c0f000.mmc: base:0x(____ptrval____) irq:8 > > Since the virtual base address is not really interesting in the first > place, let's just drop this value. We have the physical address as part > of the DT node name, which is way more useful for debugging purposes. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c > index 8e7f3e35ee3d..811b08d2d0f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c > @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto error_free_dma; > > - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "base:0x%p irq:%u\n", host->reg_base, host->irq); > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "irq:%u\n", host->irq); Can't we just remove it? It doesn't look like it brings much value anyway. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
