On 3 July 2018 at 04:25, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I think either way is OK, since flexible array is used in kernel code quite commonly,
>> so I prefer to make code change as small as possible, the original patch can also prevent
>> similar bug in future. And like below commit Fabio pointed out, it also has same kind
>> of fix: a158531f3c92 ("gpio: 74x164: Fix crash during .remove()"). Thanks.
>
> I am also fine with this patch or the one from Linus.
>
> Maybe Anson's patch could be applied to 4.18-rc as a bug fix and
> Linus' patch could be applied to 4.19-rc1 as a cleanup/improvement?
Good idea!
I have queued up Anson's v2 patch as a fix for 4.18.
Linus, can please re-post a re-based version of your change on top!? I
guess you can add Anson's and Fabio's reviewed by tags for it as well.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
