On 4 January 2018 at 16:30, Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We need to return in case of error even if the actual implementation > of sdhci_runtime_suspend_host always return 0. We don't want to > power down the clock and the assuption is that the sdhci_runtime_suspend_host > always let the system consistent in case of failure > > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied for next! Adrian, please tell me if you are not happy with this. Kind regards Uffe > --- > Changes None > > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index 85140c9..d08c21e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -1389,6 +1389,8 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > int ret; > > ret = sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(host); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > if (host->tuning_mode != SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3) > mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc); > -- > 2.7.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
