RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: API for accessing host supported maximum segment count and size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



++

Thanks,
Xu

-----Original Message-----
From: Xinming Hu 
Sent: 2017年11月21日 19:59
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wei-Ning Huang <wnhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cathy Luo <cluo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhiyuan Yang <yangzy@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Tim Song <songtao@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Xu (Shanghai) Wang <xwang4@xxxxxxxxxxx>; James Cao <jcao@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: API for accessing host supported maximum segment count and size

Hi Ulf,

Would you mind re-posting a re-based series instead? In that way you hopefully get some more people's attention as well.
>>> Sure. Could you please point the latest mmc git code base ? I guess 
>>> it is
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git/
But looks quite old.
 
Regards,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 19:44
To: Xinming Hu
Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam; Wei-Ning Huang; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cathy Luo; Zhiyuan Yang; Tim Song; Xu (Shanghai) Wang; James Cao; Ganapathi Bhat
Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: API for accessing host supported maximum segment count and size

External Email

----------------------------------------------------------------------
On 16 November 2017 at 14:57, Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Could you please let us know if you have any further review comments on this patch series.

Seems like this fallen through the cracks.

Would you mind re-posting a re-based series instead? In that way you hopefully get some more people's attention as well.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Regards,
> Simon


>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amitkumar Karwar
>> Sent: 2016年8月9日 18:16
>> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wei-Ning Huang 
>> <wnhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cathy Luo 
>> <cluo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: API for accessing host supported 
>> maximum segment count and size
>>
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>> > From: Amitkumar Karwar [mailto:akarwar@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:53 PM
>> > To: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam; Wei-Ning Huang; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>> > Cathy Luo; Xinming Hu; Amitkumar Karwar
>> > Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: API for accessing host supported 
>> > maximum segment count and size
>> >
>> > From: Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > sdio device drivers need be able to get the host supported max_segs 
>> > and max_seg_size, so that they know the buffer size to allocate 
>> > while utilizing the scatter/gather DMA buffer list.
>> >
>> > This patch provides API for this purpose.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > v2: v2 was submitted with minor improvement like replacing BUG_ON() 
>> > with
>> > WARN_ON()
>> > v3: Addressed below review comments from Ulf Hansson
>> >     a) In v3, patch has been split into two separate patches.
>> >     b) Patch 1/2 introduces an API to fetch max_seg_size and max_segs
>> >     c) Replaced WARN_ON() with proper error code when 
>> > sg_ptr->length is invalid
>> >     d) Instead of duplicating the code in mmc_io_rw_extended(), 
>> > extra bool parameter
>> >        has been added to this function and used it in new APIs for SG.
>> > v4: Removed WARN_ON() calls in newly added APIs. It's gets called 
>> > in probe handler.
>> >     Caller already takes care of it(Shawn Lin).
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c                          | 21
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c   |  6 +++---
>> >  include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h                       |  3 +++
>> >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any further review comments for this 
>> patch series.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Amitkumar
?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳i?)?骅w*jg????????G??⒏⒎?:+v????????????"??????



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux