On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 05:01:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:58:52AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Add complete to DMA ops to allow DMAC implementation dependent
> > handling of DMA completion.
> >
> > Also implement the operation for SDHI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Codewise, I am all fine with this patch. There is one naming, however:
>
> > + void (*complete)(struct tmio_mmc_host *host);
>
> I'd rather call it 'dataend'. For internal DMAC, it is the same. But for
> SYS-DMAC there is difference between DATAEND and DMA_COMPLETE. This is
> exactly the reason we have commit 52ad9a8e854ca1 ("mmc: tmio: ensure end
> of DMA and SD access are in sync").
>
> Basically, something like %s/complete/dataend/g would do it for me...
Sure, I will change this.
'compete' seemed like a nice name but I accept your reasoning above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
