On 04/05/2017 10:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The eSDHC can only DMA from 32-bit-aligned addresses.
>>
>> This fixes the following test cases of mmc_test:
>> 11: Badly aligned write
>> 12: Badly aligned read
>> 13: Badly aligned multi-block write
>> 14: Badly aligned multi-block read
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Is this the right description? I thought that SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR
> was for devices that cannot address high memory above 0xffffffff, rather than
> requiring a specific alignment.
>
> If this is indeed an address range problem rather than an alignment problem,
> are you sure it is the SD controller that is wrong here, rather than having a
> 64-bit DMA capable SDHCI connected to a 32-bit parent bus? In the
> latter case, the dma-ranges property in the parent bus should limit
> the addressing, not the device.
No, this is the right description. This quirk really is about alignment, and not
about address range. See:
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h:
>---
/* Controller can only DMA from 32-bit aligned addresses */
#define SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR (1<<7)
<---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @ sdhci_prepare_data():
>---
offset_mask = 0;
[...]
if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR)
offset_mask = 3;
[...]
if (sg->offset & offset_mask) {
DBG("Reverting to PIO because of bad alignment\n");
host->flags &= ~SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA;
break;
}
<---
Benoît
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
