Re: [PATCH 3/9] mmc: meson-gx: improve meson_mmc_clk_set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/2017 05:58 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> The following changes are quite small, therefore I combined them in
> one patch.
> 
> - ret doesn't need to be initialized with 0
> - use standard !clk_rate notation to check for a zero value
> - If clk_rate is zero we return here. Therefore all further checks
>   in this function for clk_rate != 0 are not needed.
> - switch from dev_warn to dev_err if the clock can't be set
> - If due to clock source and available divider values the requested
>   frequency isn't matched exactly (always the case if requested
>   frequency is 52 MHz), then just print the differing values as
>   debug message and not as warning.
> - Also remove ret from the message as it is always 0.
> - In the case of actual frequency not exactly matching the requested
>   one set mmc->actual_clock to the requested frequency.
>   So far mmc->actual_clock wasn't set at all in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> index 38edc60d..529a4f22 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ struct sd_emmc_desc {
>  static int meson_mmc_clk_set(struct meson_host *host, unsigned long clk_rate)
>  {
>  	struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
>  	u32 cfg;
>  
>  	if (clk_rate) {
> @@ -202,29 +202,31 @@ static int meson_mmc_clk_set(struct meson_host *host, unsigned long clk_rate)
>  	dev_dbg(host->dev, "change clock rate %u -> %lu\n",
>  		mmc->actual_clock, clk_rate);
>  
> -	if (clk_rate == 0) {
> +	if (!clk_rate) {
>  		mmc->actual_clock = 0;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = clk_set_rate(host->cfg_div_clk, clk_rate);
> -	if (ret)
> -		dev_warn(host->dev, "Unable to set cfg_div_clk to %lu. ret=%d\n",
> -			 clk_rate, ret);
> -	else if (clk_rate && clk_rate != clk_get_rate(host->cfg_div_clk))
> -		dev_warn(host->dev, "divider requested rate %lu != actual rate %lu: ret=%d\n",
> -			 clk_rate, clk_get_rate(host->cfg_div_clk), ret);
> -	else
> -		mmc->actual_clock = clk_rate;
> -
> -	/* (re)start clock, if non-zero */
> -	if (!ret && clk_rate) {
> -		cfg = readl(host->regs + SD_EMMC_CFG);
> -		cfg &= ~CFG_STOP_CLOCK;
> -		writel(cfg, host->regs + SD_EMMC_CFG);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(host->dev, "Unable to set cfg_div_clk to %lu. ret=%d\n",
> +			clk_rate, ret);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	if (clk_rate != clk_get_rate(host->cfg_div_clk))
> +		dev_dbg(host->dev,
> +			"divider requested rate %lu != actual rate %lu\n",
> +			clk_rate, clk_get_rate(host->cfg_div_clk));
> +
> +	mmc->actual_clock = clk_rate;

debug message is described actual_rate as clk_get_rate()..
What is correct "actual_clock"?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> +
> +	/* (re)start clock */
> +	cfg = readl(host->regs + SD_EMMC_CFG);
> +	cfg &= ~CFG_STOP_CLOCK;
> +	writel(cfg, host->regs + SD_EMMC_CFG);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux