Re: [PATCH v2] sdhci-esdhc-imx: Correct two register accesses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/16 21:39, Aaron Brice wrote:
>  - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as
>    compared to the sdhci standard.  This is accounted for in
>    many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the
>    INT_STATUS register by writing a 1 to that location.
>  - The HOST_CONTROL register is very different as compared to
>    the sdhci standard.  This is accounted for in the write
>    case, but not when read back out (which it is in the sdhci
>    code).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Russell <david.russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Brice <aaron.brice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux