Hello,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:09:28PM +0200, Alexander Kurz wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > On 09.10.2016 18:34, Alexander Kurz wrote:
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc", "fsl,imx53-esdhc";
> > > [...]
> >
> > Regarding DTS change if the controllers are the same I think it may
> > have sense to add "fsl,imx50-esdhc" compatible to imx53.dtsi definitions,
> > but not the other way round.
> Is there some requirement for ascending numbers?
No, usually the older hardware defines the major name[1]. So IMHO the change
under discussion here is fine. Check the output of
git grep imx27 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25.dtsi
to get a few samples of a similar case. (i.e. imx25 is newer but got
the smaller number.)
Best regards
Uwe
[1] I'd expect that older might also mean "first supported by a
binding".
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
