On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add the sd-uhs-sdr104 property to SDHI0. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts > index 749ba02b6a53..05d1ff7acee2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts > @@ -559,6 +559,7 @@ > vqmmc-supply = <&vccq_sdhi0>; > cd-gpios = <&gpio3 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > sd-uhs-sdr50; > + sd-uhs-sdr104; > status = "okay"; Hi Simon, Thanks for this - interesting to see!! From what I can tell this code is targeting r8a7790 Lager, and based on the data sheet and the DTS there are four SDHI channels for the r8a7790 SoC. All R-Car Gen2 SDHI channels are not identical, so on r8a7790 it looks like SDHI0 and SDHI1 have extended capabilities for the clocks (and probably support SDR104) while SDHI2 and SDHI3 do not have this hardware feature. How is this difference handled today? In my mind it would make sense to have different compat strings, but I think we differentiate with resource size today? So with this patches I can see that you enable SDR104 on SDHI0 on Lager which makes sense, but is SDHI2 support still OK? Cheers, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
