On 22 January 2016 at 04:32, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch enables mmc hosts to suspend/resume asynchronously.
> This will improve system suspend/resume speed. After applying
> this patch and enabling all mmc hosts' child devices to
> suspend/resume asynchronously on ASUS T100TA, the system
> suspend-to-idle time is reduced from 1645ms to 1107ms, and the
> system resume time is reduced from 940ms to 914ms.
Do you really reduce time at all with this patch by its own? I think not.
Moreover, I thought the biggest improvement came from the patch which
enabled async suspend/resume for the MMC/SD/SDIO device?
ec076cd226c3 ("mmc: enable MMC/SD/SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously")
Similar comment applies to patch2/2, but I would expect it together
with the $subject patch gives an improvement.
Please update the change-logs one more round.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update commit message
>
> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> index 0aecd5c..1d94607 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ struct mmc_host *mmc_alloc_host(int extra, struct device *dev)
> host->class_dev.parent = dev;
> host->class_dev.class = &mmc_host_class;
> device_initialize(&host->class_dev);
> + device_enable_async_suspend(&host->class_dev);
>
> if (mmc_gpio_alloc(host)) {
> put_device(&host->class_dev);
> -- 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
