On 19 November 2015 at 12:58, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 12:52:06 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 18 November 2015 at 10:47, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > This is a trivial patch which fixes printed strings split across two >> > or more lines in the source. I tried to grep for some error output*, >> > but I couldn't find it easily because it was broken across multiple >> > lines. This patch makes my life easier. >> > >> > * in particular "Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt." >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi! > >> Future wise, no need to add a Cc tag here. You should send the patch >> to me anyway. > > Are CC tags now frowned upon? In case I have multiple distinct patches > (which go to distinct lists/recipients) in a queue, I use these CC tags > to track who to keep in a loop. Is there some better way to do this? As this was a separate patch I didn't quite understand the Cc. If the patch is a part of a patchset, it makes more sense if it involves different subsystems/maintainers. Anyway, no big deal for me! If I don't like the Cc tag, I can easily remove it when applying. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
