On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 12:52:06 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 18 November 2015 at 10:47, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a trivial patch which fixes printed strings split across two > > or more lines in the source. I tried to grep for some error output*, > > but I couldn't find it easily because it was broken across multiple > > lines. This patch makes my life easier. > > > > * in particular "Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt." > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi! > Future wise, no need to add a Cc tag here. You should send the patch > to me anyway. Are CC tags now frowned upon? In case I have multiple distinct patches (which go to distinct lists/recipients) in a queue, I use these CC tags to track who to keep in a loop. Is there some better way to do this? > Thanks, applied for next! Thanks. > FYI: There were some check patch warnings, but I decided to ignore > them as those are related to the use of the DBG macro. Oh yeah, the DBG() macro struck me as slightly odd. We should probably use dev_err() or pr_err() where applicable. > Kind regards > Uffe [..] Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
