Hi Ulf,
[...]
>
> One of my comments for v2, was that I think you should remove all code which
> was related to HPI to interrupt sleep notification from the runtime PM resume
> path. Instead I wanted you to add that functionality as separate patch based on
> top of this patch.
>
> You haven't done that in v3, why?
The sleep_notify call was moved to suspend() per your recommendation.
As far as I understand, no new requests should be sent during mmc_suspend() process,
thus HPI support is not needed anymore.
Is this the correct assumption?
The only case where HPI is used in this patch - is during sleep_notify timeout error.
Thanks,
Alex
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��i��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
