Hi, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I still don't exactly have a warm fuzzy about using the send_status() > command like this, but it seems to work (actually, I should verify > that myself--I've been taking Addy's word that his solution works). So I finally started up a stress test. I picked Addy's patch and reverted my big fat delay. Result was that Addy's patch doesn't seem to hurt but once I revert my big fat delay then I seem to start getting failures. :( I think it's actually on a different SD card than the one that was originally causing failures, FWIW. As usual with these kinds of tests, I'd like to test this a whole lot more since it only reproduces sometimes, but unfortunately I'm going to be unavailable for a few weeks starting from today, so I'm not sure I'm not sure I can do more debugging / testing than what I've already done... ...but unless using send_status allows us to remove the delay (or unless there's some other justification for it) then it seems like we should just drop this series... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
