On 29 January 2015 at 15:17, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:04:24 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 27 January 2015 at 15:34, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi Ulf, >> > >> > Le Tuesday 27 January 2015 à 15:06 +0100, Ulf Hansson a écrit : >> >> On 26 January 2015 at 11:23, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > I seem to understand that the sdhci-pxav3 and sdhci-pxav2 drivers are >> >> > only needed on the MMP architecture. So add a hardware dependency on >> >> > ARCH_MMP, so that other users don't get to build useless drivers. >> >> >> >> I would rather see the default option to be N. >> >> Thus those configurations that needs this driver will have to select it. >> > >> > This is a different question. The purpose of my patch is that people >> > configuring kernels for systems which just can't have these controllers, >> > are not asked about this driver at all. Changing the default to N would >> > not achieve that. >> >> For those SOC that want these drivers, they should be able to select >> them from their defconfigs. So it will be an opt-in instead of opt-out >> policy, which I prefer. It also follows the other Kconfig options for >> mmc drivers. > > As you wish. But that change would be a separate patch going on top of > mine, right? I'm not sure I understand what you expect from me at this > point, please clarify. Sorry for being unclear. I don't like $subject patch. Send a new one, removing the following lines: default CPU_MMP2 default CPU_PXA910 Then you send another patch(es) to the respective SOC maintainer, updating the defonfig(s) selecting MMC_SDHCI_PXAV3|PXAV2, when appropriate. Would that work? Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
