On 21 January 2015 at 14:54, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/21/2015 11:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 15 January 2015 at 18:33, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> Ah, having read the explanation in the next patch, I think ... >>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt >>> >>> >>>> +- delay : delay to wait after driving the reset gpio active [ms]. >>> >>> >>> ... delay is the wrong name. reset-pulse-width or reset-pulse-length would >>> be better. delay sounds like a delay after resetting the device before it >>> can be accessed. >> >> I agree with Stephen's proposal. > > Cool. > >> This patch needs to be rebased and retested on latest version the >> mmc-pwrseq patches. > > Sure. > >> Moreover, if you think the patchset which $subject >> patch is a part of is material for 3.20, I will need to share an >> immutable branch with the mmc-pwrseq patches for ARM SOC to pull in, >> tell me if you need that. > > I don't think this will make 3.20 as I have other series with higher > priority and there's quite some work left to do on this one. If that's the case, I might as well consider this patch separately and take it through my mmc tree. Of course, that means you anyway need to rebase/test it. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
