On 01/21/2015 11:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 15 January 2015 at 18:33, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Ah, having read the explanation in the next patch, I think ... >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt >> >> >>> +- delay : delay to wait after driving the reset gpio active [ms]. >> >> >> ... delay is the wrong name. reset-pulse-width or reset-pulse-length would >> be better. delay sounds like a delay after resetting the device before it >> can be accessed. > > I agree with Stephen's proposal. Cool. > This patch needs to be rebased and retested on latest version the > mmc-pwrseq patches. Sure. > Moreover, if you think the patchset which $subject > patch is a part of is material for 3.20, I will need to share an > immutable branch with the mmc-pwrseq patches for ARM SOC to pull in, > tell me if you need that. I don't think this will make 3.20 as I have other series with higher priority and there's quite some work left to do on this one. Regards, Tomeu > Kind regards > Uffe > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
