On 10 July 2014 13:53, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, Ulf. >> > >> > On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks. >> >>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.) >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Hi Jaehoon, >> >> >> >> I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share >> >> them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys. >> >> Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up. >> >> Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc >> patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other >> words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and >> 5. >> > > [PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc > [PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc > [PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk > > 2nd and 4th are closely related 5th. > I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch? > And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix. > (Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.) > > Kukjin, > Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's? I tried applied the complete patchset for 3.16 rc4, but some of the DTS patches fails. What are these patches based upon? I wonder if it's not best to leave all these for Kukjin to handle instead. You have my ack for all of the mmc patches! Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
