RE: [PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi, Ulf.
> >
> > On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
> >>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Hi Jaehoon,
> >>
> >> I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
> >> them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
> >> Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.
> 
> Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc
> patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other
> words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and
> 5.
> 

[PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

2nd and 4th are closely related 5th.
I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch?
And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix.
(Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.)

Kukjin,
Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's?

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux