On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, Ulf. > > > > On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks. > >>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.) > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Hi Jaehoon, > >> > >> I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share > >> them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys. > >> Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up. > > Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc > patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other > words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and > 5. > [PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc [PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc [PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk 2nd and 4th are closely related 5th. I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch? And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix. (Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.) Kukjin, Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's? Thanks, Seungwon Jeon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
