On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:45:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > @@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host,
> > {
> > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> > - unsigned int host_clock = pltfm_host->clock;
> > + unsigned int host_clock = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per);
>
> Will this bring the issue that commit a974862faee1 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx:
> fix access hardirq-unsafe lock in atomic context) fixed back to us?
Probably, yes, because the §%$&"$$ sdhc driver still uses spinlocks.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
