Re: [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add f_max field to private data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:45:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > @@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >  {
> >  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> >  	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> > -	unsigned int host_clock = pltfm_host->clock;
> > +	unsigned int host_clock = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per);
> 
> Will this bring the issue that commit a974862faee1 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx:
> fix access hardirq-unsafe lock in atomic context) fixed back to us?

Probably, yes, because the §%$&"$$ sdhc driver still uses spinlocks.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux