On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:33:00PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > The driver filled in the clk and clock fields in struct > sdhci_pltfm_host, but they are unused in the sdhci-pltfm > code and only ever used it for internal use. This adds > a field f_max to private data and uses it instead. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index b841bb7..d530820 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data { > struct pinctrl_state *pins_200mhz; > const struct esdhc_soc_data *socdata; > struct esdhc_platform_data boarddata; > + unsigned long f_max; > struct clk *clk_ipg; > struct clk *clk_ahb; > struct clk *clk_per; > @@ -574,19 +575,16 @@ static unsigned int esdhc_pltfm_get_max_clock(struct sdhci_host *host) > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv; > - struct esdhc_platform_data *boarddata = &imx_data->boarddata; > > - if (boarddata->f_max && (boarddata->f_max < pltfm_host->clock)) > - return boarddata->f_max; > - else > - return pltfm_host->clock; > + return imx_data->f_max; > } > > static unsigned int esdhc_pltfm_get_min_clock(struct sdhci_host *host) > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > + struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv; > > - return pltfm_host->clock / 256 / 16; > + return imx_data->f_max / 256 / 16; > } > > static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, > @@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv; > - unsigned int host_clock = pltfm_host->clock; > + unsigned int host_clock = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per); Will this bring the issue that commit a974862faee1 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix access hardirq-unsafe lock in atomic context) fixed back to us? Shawn > int pre_div = 2; > int div = 1; > u32 temp, val; > @@ -994,8 +992,6 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto free_sdhci; > } > > - pltfm_host->clk = imx_data->clk_per; > - pltfm_host->clock = clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk); > clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_per); > clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_ipg); > clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_ahb); > @@ -1051,6 +1047,10 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > host->mmc->parent->platform_data); > } > > + imx_data->f_max = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per); > + if (boarddata->f_max && boarddata->f_max < imx_data->f_max) > + imx_data->f_max = boarddata->f_max; > + > /* write_protect */ > if (boarddata->wp_type == ESDHC_WP_GPIO) { > err = mmc_gpio_request_ro(host->mmc, boarddata->wp_gpio); > -- > 2.0.0.rc0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html