Hi David,
On 02/05/2014 02:01 PM, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi Maxime
I have four comments here:
- Read Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially Section 5 and 12
(hints, you forgot the clock maintainers for your clock patches
and you didn't put any signed-off-by tags)
Oops. I added signed-offs now
- You ignored pretty much all the comments that were made during the
review of the first version. Go through
Uh? I just fixed the commits and squashed them together for easier handling.
I'm even using mmc_of_parse now...
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/219339.
html and address the comments that were made.
- Each of your patches should compile. Fix the order of your
patches.
Done.
- Submit a v3, with the changes you made. Otherwise we have no way
of knowing what have been fixed and what didn't
Too many patches would be bloaty.
That's why I've squashed them into small and corrected patches.
The squashing is fine, what Maxime means is that normally you would include
a changelog in the coverletter (the [patch 0/x] mail) documenting changes
done since the previous posting of the patchset, so for v3 that would have been
something like:
Changes since v1:
-use mmc_of_parse instead of diy dt parsing
-add nodes for all mmc controller to the dtsi files, including sofar unused
controllers
Changes since v2:
-Add missing Signed-off-by tags
-stop using __raw_readl / __raw_writel so that barriers are properly used
I've probably forgotten a few things, it would be good if you could send
a reply to the:
"[PATCH v3 0/7] ARM: sunxi: Add driver for SD/MMC hosts found on allwinner sunxi SOCs"
mail with the above changelog, amended with whatever I've forgotten to add
to the above changelog
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
