Hi Maxime > I have four comments here: > - Read Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially Section 5 and 12 > (hints, you forgot the clock maintainers for your clock patches > and you didn't put any signed-off-by tags) Oops. I added signed-offs now > - You ignored pretty much all the comments that were made during the > review of the first version. Go through Uh? I just fixed the commits and squashed them together for easier handling. I'm even using mmc_of_parse now... > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/219339. > html and address the comments that were made. > - Each of your patches should compile. Fix the order of your > patches. Done. > - Submit a v3, with the changes you made. Otherwise we have no way > of knowing what have been fixed and what didn't Too many patches would be bloaty. That's why I've squashed them into small and corrected patches. > Looking forward for the next iteration! Good :-) You can have a look at the recent status here: http://git.o2s.ch/?p=linux-next.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/20140205 cheers David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
