On 4 September 2013 14:54, Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Freescale i.MX6Q/DL uSDHC clock tuning progress is a little different from
> the standard tuning process defined in host controller spec v3.0.
> Thus we use platform_execute_tuning instead of standard sdhci tuning.
>
> The main difference are:
> 1) not only generate Buffer Read Ready interrupt when tuning is performing.
> It generates all other DATA interrupts like the normal data command.
> 2) SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING is not automatically cleared by HW,
> instead it's controlled by SW.
> 3) SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK is not automatically set by HW,
> it's controlled by SW.
> 4) the clock delay for every tuning is set by SW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 3118a82..36b9f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -34,9 +34,21 @@
> #define ESDHC_WTMK_LVL 0x44
> #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL 0x48
> #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AC23EN (1 << 7)
> +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE (1 << 22)
> +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL (1 << 23)
> +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AUTO_TUNE (1 << 24)
> +#define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL (1 << 25)
> /* Bits 3 and 6 are not SDHCI standard definitions */
> #define ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SDHCI_MASK 0xb7
>
> +/* tune control register */
> +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS 0x68
> +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP 1
> +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MIN 0
> +#define ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX ((1 << 7) - 1)
> +
> +#define ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN 64
> +
> /*
> * Our interpretation of the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL register
> */
> @@ -87,7 +99,7 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data {
> MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS, /* exact multiblock cmd in process */
> WAIT_FOR_INT, /* sent CMD12, waiting for response INT */
> } multiblock_status;
> -
> + u32 uhs_mode;
> };
>
> static struct platform_device_id imx_esdhc_devtype[] = {
> @@ -161,6 +173,17 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> u32 val = readl(host->ioaddr + reg);
>
> + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE)) {
> + u32 fsl_prss = val;
> + val = 0;
> + /* save the least 20 bits */
> + val |= fsl_prss & 0x000FFFFF;
> + /* move dat[0-3] bits */
> + val |= (fsl_prss & 0x0F000000) >> 4;
> + /* move cmd line bit */
> + val |= (fsl_prss & 0x00800000) << 1;
> + }
> +
> if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) {
> /* In FSL esdhc IC module, only bit20 is used to indicate the
> * ADMA2 capability of esdhc, but this bit is messed up on
> @@ -175,6 +198,17 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> }
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1) && is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data))
> + val = SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104
> + | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50;
> +
> + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT) && is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> + val = 0;
> + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_330_SHIFT;
> + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_300_SHIFT;
> + val |= 0xFF << SDHCI_MAX_CURRENT_180_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_STATUS)) {
> if (val & ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR) {
> val &= ~ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR;
> @@ -253,6 +287,8 @@ static u16 esdhc_readw_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> {
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> + u16 ret = 0;
> + u32 val;
>
> if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_HOST_VERSION)) {
> reg ^= 2;
> @@ -265,6 +301,25 @@ static u16 esdhc_readw_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> }
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2)) {
> + val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + if (val & ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT)
> + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180;
> +
> + if (is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> + val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + if (val & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE)
> + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> + if (val & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL)
> + ret |= SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> + }
> +
> + ret |= (imx_data->uhs_mode & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK);
> + ret &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE;
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return readw(host->ioaddr + reg);
> }
>
> @@ -272,8 +327,32 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> {
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> + u32 new_val = 0;
>
> switch (reg) {
> + case SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL:
> + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + if (val & SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN)
> + new_val |= ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON;
> + else
> + new_val &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON;
> + writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + return;
> + case SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2:
> + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)
> + new_val |= ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT;
> + else
> + new_val &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_VSELECT;
> + writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + imx_data->uhs_mode = val & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK;
> + new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)
> + new_val |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> + else
> + new_val &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> + writel(new_val , host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + return;
> case SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE:
> if ((imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT)
> && (host->cmd->opcode == SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED)
> @@ -451,6 +530,118 @@ static int esdhc_pltfm_bus_width(struct sdhci_host *host, int width)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void esdhc_prepare_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL |
> + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> + writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + writel((val << 8), host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
> + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> + "tunning with delay 0x%x ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS 0x%x\n",
> + val, readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS));
> +}
> +
> +static void request_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> + complete(&mrq->completion);
> +}
> +
> +static int esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
This function implements protocol related code. It should not reside
in a host driver but instead as an API in the mmc protocol layer which
host drivers shall call.
I realize that there are already other host drivers implementing
similar protocol code as here. Those should move to use the new API
once it is available.
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
> +{
> + struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
> + struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
> + struct mmc_data data = {0};
> + struct scatterlist sg;
> + char tuning_pattern[ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN];
> +
> + cmd.opcode = opcode;
> + cmd.arg = 0;
> + cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> +
> + data.blksz = ESDHC_TUNING_BLOCK_PATTERN_LEN;
> + data.blocks = 1;
> + data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
> + data.sg = &sg;
> + data.sg_len = 1;
> +
> + sg_init_one(&sg, tuning_pattern, sizeof(tuning_pattern));
> +
> + mrq.cmd = &cmd;
> + mrq.cmd->mrq = &mrq;
> + mrq.data = &data;
> + mrq.data->mrq = &mrq;
> + mrq.cmd->data = mrq.data;
> +
> + mrq.done = request_done;
> + init_completion(&(mrq.completion));
> +
> + disable_irq(host->irq);
> + spin_lock(&host->lock);
> + host->mrq = &mrq;
> +
> + sdhci_send_command(host, mrq.cmd);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> + enable_irq(host->irq);
> +
> + wait_for_completion(&mrq.completion);
> +
> + if (cmd.error)
> + return cmd.error;
> + if (data.error)
> + return data.error;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void esdhc_post_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + reg &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> + writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static int esdhc_executing_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> + int min, max, avg, ret;
> +
> + /* find the mininum delay first which can pass tuning*/
> + min = ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MIN;
> + while (min < ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX) {
> + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, min);
> + if (!esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode))
> + break;
> + min += ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> + }
> +
> + /* find the maxinum delay which can not pass tuning*/
> + max = min + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> + while (max < ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_MAX) {
> + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, max);
> + if (esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode)) {
> + max -= ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> + break;
> + }
> + max += ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STEP;
> + }
> +
> + /* use average delay to get the best timing */
> + avg = (min + max) / 2;
> + esdhc_prepare_tuning(host, avg);
> + ret = esdhc_send_tuning_cmd(host, opcode);
> + esdhc_post_tuning(host);
> +
> + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "tunning %s at 0x%x ret %d\n",
> + ret ? "failed" : "passed", avg, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> .read_l = esdhc_readl_le,
> .read_w = esdhc_readw_le,
> @@ -462,6 +653,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> .get_min_clock = esdhc_pltfm_get_min_clock,
> .get_ro = esdhc_pltfm_get_ro,
> .platform_bus_width = esdhc_pltfm_bus_width,
> + .platform_execute_tuning = esdhc_executing_tuning,
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata = {
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
