* Balaji T K <balajitk@xxxxxx> [130612 07:39]: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 07:55 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >* Balaji T K <balajitk@xxxxxx> [130606 12:20]: > >>handle vcc and vcc_aux independently > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@xxxxxx> > >>--- > >> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 9 +++++---- > >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >>index 1865321..bda1a42 100644 > >>--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >>+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >>@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_set_power(struct device *dev, int slot, int power_on, > >> * If we don't see a Vcc regulator, assume it's a fixed > >> * voltage always-on regulator. > >> */ > >>- if (!host->vcc) > >>+ if (!host->vcc && !host->vcc_aux) > >> return 0; > >> /* > >> * With DT, never turn OFF the regulator for MMC1. This is because > > > >Doesn't the above change break MMC for most boards that only pass > >one regulator and no aux regulator? > > > > No, I want to skip regulator operation in set_power function iff both > regulator are not present. > > Earlier vcc was assumed/mandatory if vcc_aux is present. > Now, regulator operation will be handled if either one of vcc/vcc_aux is present, Ah OK yes sorry I misread your patch. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
