Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: core: enhance the code for signal voltage setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/12/14 Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2012/12/14 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 14 December 2012 11:53, Kevin Liu <kliu5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 1. if host does NOT implement signal voltage setting function,
>>> should return error.
>>> 2. add the check for data signal before voltage change according
>>> to the spec. If host does NOT detect a low signal level, the host
>>> should abort the voltage switch sequence. (phisical layer spec 4.2.4.2(4))
>>> 3. if voltage change failed then no need to restore the clock
>>> before cycle power the card.
>>> 4. call mmc_power_cycle here since it's a part of voltage switch.
>>> besides -EAGAIN, any other error returned should also cycle power the card.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Liu <kliu5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c |   71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>  1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> index d1aa8ab..da93186 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> @@ -1226,6 +1226,9 @@ int mmc_set_signal_voltage(struct mmc_host *host, int signal_voltage, bool cmd11
>>>
>>>         BUG_ON(!host);
>>>
>>> +       if (!host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch)
>>> +               return -EPERM;
>>> +
>>
>> No, this is not OK.
>> For example, eMMC might default use 1.8V as I/O voltage, you don't
>> want to force host drivers implementing this function to make this
>> work.
>>
> I agree.
> But then how can we make sure emmc's voltage?
> Only depend on the voltage by default?
> I will update the patch and move this judgement withine cmd11.
>
>>>         /*
>>>          * Send CMD11 only if the request is to switch the card to
>>>          * 1.8V signalling.
>>> @@ -1245,47 +1248,59 @@ int mmc_set_signal_voltage(struct mmc_host *host, int signal_voltage, bool cmd11
>>>
>>>         host->ios.signal_voltage = signal_voltage;
>>>
>>> -       if (host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch) {
>>> -               u32 clock;
>>> +       u32 clock;
>>> +
>>> +       mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>> +
>>> +       if (cmd11) {
>>> +               if (!host->ops->card_busy)
>>> +                       pr_warning("%s: cannot verify signal voltage switch\n",
>>> +                                       mmc_hostname(host));
>>>
>>> -               mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>>                 /*
>>>                  * During a signal voltage level switch, the clock must be gated
>>>                  * for a certain period of time according to the SD spec
>>>                  */
>>> -               if (cmd11) {
>>> -                       clock = host->ios.clock;
>>> -                       host->ios.clock = 0;
>>> -                       mmc_set_ios(host);
>>> -               }
>>> +               clock = host->ios.clock;
>>> +               host->ios.clock = 0;
>>> +               mmc_set_ios(host);
>>>
>>> -               err = host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch(host, &host->ios);
>>> +               if (host->ops->card_busy && !host->ops->card_busy(host)) {
>>> +                       err = -EAGAIN;
>>> +               } else {
>>
>> Great that you spotted this! We should check busy before we do the
>> actual voltage switch.
>>
>> Although, I think it would make sense to do this before the clock is
>> set to 0. Especially important for those host controllers that do
>> support busy-detection, a qualified guess would be that those also
>> could require the clock to be on to detect this. Or what do you think?
>> From spec point of view it shall be safe to do it before setting clk
>> to 0.
>>
> I considered this when I draft this patch.
> My only concern is whether DAT level is stable at that point.
> According to the spec, the card driver DAT[3:0] to low at the NEXT
> clock of the end bit for R1 response after completing the R1 response.
> I'm not sure whether the status is stable if we query the DAT level
> just after cmd11.
>

How about adding a 1ms delay between cmd11 response and calling card_busy?
And we can do this before the clock is set to 0.
As spec said the timing

> I agree with you that it will be safer to keep clock on when detecting.
>
>>>
>>> -               if (err && cmd11) {
>>> -                       host->ios.clock = clock;
>>> -                       mmc_set_ios(host);
>>> -               } else if (cmd11) {
>>> -                       /* Keep clock gated for at least 5 ms */
>>> -                       mmc_delay(5);
>>> -                       host->ios.clock = clock;
>>> -                       mmc_set_ios(host);
>>> +                       err = host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch(host, &host->ios);
>>>
>>> -                       /* Wait for at least 1 ms according to spec */
>>> -                       mmc_delay(1);
>>> +                       if (!err) {
>>> +                               /* Keep clock gated for at least 5 ms */
>>> +                               mmc_delay(5);
>>> +                               host->ios.clock = clock;
>>> +                               mmc_set_ios(host);
>>>
>>> -                       /*
>>> -                        * Failure to switch is indicated by the card holding
>>> -                        * dat[0:3] low
>>> -                        */
>>> -                       if (!host->ops->card_busy)
>>> -                               pr_warning("%s: cannot verify signal voltage switch\n",
>>> +                               /* Wait for at least 1 ms according to spec */
>>> +                               mmc_delay(1);
>>> +
>>> +                               /*
>>> +                                * Failure to switch is indicated by the card holding
>>> +                                * dat[0:3] low
>>> +                                */
>>> +                               if (host->ops->card_busy && host->ops->card_busy(host))
>>> +                                       err = -EAGAIN;
>>> +                       }
>>> +               }
>>> +               if (err) {
>>> +                       /* Power cycle card */
>>> +                       pr_debug("%s: Signal voltage switch failed, "
>>> +                                       "power cycling card \n",
>>>                                         mmc_hostname(host));
>>> -                       else if (host->ops->card_busy(host))
>>> -                               err = -EAGAIN;
>>> +                       mmc_power_cycle(host);
>>>                 }
>>> -               mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>> +       } else {
>>> +               err = host->ops->start_signal_voltage_switch(host, &host->ios);
>>>         }
>>>
>>> +       mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>> +
>>>         return err;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux