On 16/11/12 13:30, Girish K S wrote:
> On 16 November 2012 18:51, Srinivas KANDAGATLA
> <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch uses of_simple_module_id_table macro to replace code like:
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> static struct of_device_id xxx_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "yyy,xxx" },
>> { },
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xxx_of_match);
>> #endif
>>
>> with
>> of_simple_module_id_table(xxx_of_match, "yyy,zzz");
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 7 +------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> index 660bbc5..1e9596a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> @@ -218,12 +218,7 @@ static struct dw_mci_drv_data exynos5250_drv_data = {
>> .setup_bus = dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_exynos_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc",
>> - .data = (void *)&exynos5250_drv_data, },
>> - {},
>> -};
> Here's the problem. You are missing the driver data for the exynos
> SoC. this is very much required.
> where's the .data = (void *)&exynos5250_drv_data,?
Thanks for looking,
Yep, You are correct.
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_mci_pltfm_match);
>> +of_simple_module_id_table(dw_mci_pltfm_match, "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc");
>>
>> int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
