On 16 November 2012 18:51, Srinivas KANDAGATLA
<srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
>
> This patch uses of_simple_module_id_table macro to replace code like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static struct of_device_id xxx_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "yyy,xxx" },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xxx_of_match);
> #endif
>
> with
> of_simple_module_id_table(xxx_of_match, "yyy,zzz");
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 7 +------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 660bbc5..1e9596a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -218,12 +218,7 @@ static struct dw_mci_drv_data exynos5250_drv_data = {
> .setup_bus = dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus,
> };
>
> -static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_exynos_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc",
> - .data = (void *)&exynos5250_drv_data, },
> - {},
> -};
Here's the problem. You are missing the driver data for the exynos
SoC. this is very much required.
where's the .data = (void *)&exynos5250_drv_data,?
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_mci_pltfm_match);
> +of_simple_module_id_table(dw_mci_pltfm_match, "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc");
>
> int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
