On 20 September 2012 03:35, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> Just pinging you to see if you have an opinion in merging this without >> full testing on eMMC4.5 device? >> >> I am kind of eager to fixup the broken suspend for eMMC with sleep, >> which this does. :-) > > Well, we don't need "full testing", but I don't think it's a good idea > to merge this without any testing at all on eMMC 4.5. Might as well > just wait a little longer and send it as a 3.7 fix with a stable@ tag? > Do we have any ETA on when someone will be able to test? > Unfortunately still no progress for testing for eMMC 4.5. Sorry for that. Tanya Brokhman and possibly Arnd Bergman is trying to help out, which is really great. Although I have yet not received an answer. Hopefully soon. :-) My self is trying to get a hold of an eMMC 4.5 device, so I can do the test myself. I am not sure how long we should wait for eMMC 4.5 to be tested. Until testing is resolved the eMMC 4.3 and onwards are having a broken suspend sequence using SLEEP, which I think is really bad. This also includes eMMC4.5 devices, for which hosts is not using the new POWER_OFF _NOTIFY CAP. Kind regards Ulf Hansson > Thanks, > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> > One Laptop Per Child > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
