On 14 September 2012 20:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 14 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S >> <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Girish, >> >> >> >> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an >> >> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested. >> >> Unfortunate I don't have such a device available right now. What I did >> >> test was that patch must not break anything and tested that the >> >> suspend/resume sequence is fixed for eMMC with sleep support. I also >> >> tested this with MMC_CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY enabled. >> >> >> >> Are you able to help out in testing with a eMMC 4.5 device with >> >> POWER_OFF_NOTIFY support? >> > >> > I am also facing the same problem. The board that i used earlier to >> > upstream 4.5 patches is not functioning. Thats the reason for the >> > delay in upstreaming or sending the patch. Once i get it repaired i ll >> > definitely do it. >> > It would be helpful if somebody in the list can do this in the mean time. >> >> Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5 >> board so maybe he can test it? > > I have a few eMMC samples but am only using them with my (slow) thinkpad > SD card reader. I also don't know which eMMC-4.5 features they implement, > as some may be early prototypes. > > What exactly do you need tested? Poweroff Notify feature with the above patch in suspend to ram. > > Arnd > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
