Hi, On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hello, > > I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by > Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for > cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings. In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you receive into the patches when you resend them. Thanks! > I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already > documented and it will concern all drivers. Agreed. It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it. > Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree, > isn't it? Yes, let's do that. I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
