On Tuesday 24 July 2012, ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by > Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for > cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings. > > I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already > documented and it will concern all drivers. I just looked at the patches for the first time, but it looks all great, so Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree, > isn't it? > By the way, I have updated documentation in patch 1/4 in the same way as you > did with the patch 'mmc: dt: Deduplicate binding docs by referencing mmc.txt'. > I didn't remove common properties from slot part because I think it is not > obvious to use these properties into the slot node. If you want to take it all through the mmc tree, that's also fine with me. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
