On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer >> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c. >> >> This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx> >> Should this patch be joined with gpiolib-of's patch to of_get_named_gpio()? Or >> should they just be issued as a series? > > If it's not bisectable unless you change this in the same patch then join > them. Else I'd put them in a series and try to figure out a good tree for > merging them. Ok, so lets keep the original patch as is for now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
