On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer > of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c. > > This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer. > > Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Should this patch be joined with gpiolib-of's patch to of_get_named_gpio()? Or > should they just be issued as a series? If it's not bisectable unless you change this in the same patch then join them. Else I'd put them in a series and try to figure out a good tree for merging them. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
