On 03/16/2012 09:53 AM, Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:48:07AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Although, right know I would vote for having a more active maintainer
for MMCI; please no offense Russell, I realize that your are fully
occupied with a lot of other cool stuff. I think Linus could play a
great role in this; especially since he also will be able to test
patches on many different ARM boards.
No, I explained why I haven't applied your other patches, and I explained
at the time my concerns with your patches which zero out and restore the
power and clock registers. I repeated those concerns several times but
the issue never got resolved.
So that gives me no other option than to slow down applying your patches.
It's not that I'm not being responsive. It's that I'm purposely being
slow over these changes because comments on the patches don't seem to be
hitting home.
Then I totally misunderstood you. I did send you an explanation to why
the registers could be zeroed out, which you did not respond to.
Moreover, I did not receive any comments/acks on the other patches. Are
you only looking at the first one in a patch series or do you mean that
the other onces looks OK? If so, I can definitely try to rebase the
series and move the power management patches later in serie... Just tell
me and I will do it!
Br
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
