On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:48:07AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Although, right know I would vote for having a more active maintainer > for MMCI; please no offense Russell, I realize that your are fully > occupied with a lot of other cool stuff. I think Linus could play a > great role in this; especially since he also will be able to test > patches on many different ARM boards. No, I explained why I haven't applied your other patches, and I explained at the time my concerns with your patches which zero out and restore the power and clock registers. I repeated those concerns several times but the issue never got resolved. So that gives me no other option than to slow down applying your patches. It's not that I'm not being responsive. It's that I'm purposely being slow over these changes because comments on the patches don't seem to be hitting home. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
