On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, I still want to be involved because I'm far from convinced with > some of the patches coming from Ulf are correct for ARMs implementation. OK fine with me. > That's why I'm purposely not applying the MMCI patches in the patch system > in a particularly fast manner - I want there to be a decent amount of > testing between each set of patches. I understand this. I will try to help out more then, I have the following systems: - ARM Integrator/CP (PL181!) - ARM RealView PB1176 (PL180) - U300 (PL180 derivate) - U8500 (PL180 derivate) For the next round of series from Ulf I'll be happy to stress these a bit. > For example, the next patch in the series to be applied is: > > "mmc: mmci: Decrease current consumption in suspend" (...) > As there's an interdependence between the various patches, I can't apply > any of the later patches even if I wanted to without these "power saving" > patches. OK Ulf, can you reorder your patch queue pushing that patch towards the end so Russell can (hopefully) apply the less controversial stuff (like the SDIO fixes and so on)? > So, it's not really unmaintained or orphaned... OK, shall I propose a patch simply adding you as maintainer? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
