On 15/03/12 17:36, Lee Jones wrote: > On 15/03/12 17:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:20:00PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>> This is a step in the right direction for future Device >>> Tree support. It will allow variant specific attributes >>> to be collected from a Device Tree without overloading >>> the MMCI core. It will also provide additional future >>> variants a cleaner way to add support. >> >> NAK. You can't have two driver structures with the same name. The names >> are sysfs object names. > > Well spotted. > > I've already changed this in v2. :) In case you were interested, see: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/device-tree-snowball-mmci -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
