I do not have a mmc card to test the patch, but I tested it and confirmed it does not break anything about SD support. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On i.MX53 we have to write a special SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD to the Is this i.MX53 only? > SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE register during a MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION > command. This works for SD cards. However, with MMC cards > the MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT command is used instead, but this needs > the same handling. Fix MMC cards by testing for the > MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT command aswell. Tested on a custom i.MX53 > board with a Transcend MMC+ card and eMMC. > I did not find the similar handling in FSL internal tree, but I think that FSL QA team should have tested it with MMC/eMMC card. Regards, Shawn > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index d601e41..cd35dc4 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -269,7 +269,8 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) > imx_data->scratchpad = val; > return; > case SDHCI_COMMAND: > - if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION) > + if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION || > + host->cmd->opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT) > && (imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT)) > val |= SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD; > > -- > 1.7.9 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
