On 11/28/11 12:07, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/28/11 11:23, Eliad Peller wrote: >>> hi Igor, >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 11/22/11 16:02, Eliad Peller wrote: >>>>> Add pm_caps field to omap2_hsmmc_info and omap_mmc_slot_data >>>>> structs, so we will be able to indicate mmc pm capabilities >>>>> in the board file. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't this be user space runtime controllable? >>>> Instead of being a static per board decision? >>>> >>> we only declare here support for the pm capabilities. >>> the actual configuration of these capabilities is done at a later >>> stage, and can be controlled (implicitly) by userspace (e.g. by >>> enabling Wakeup-On-Wireless for the wl12xx chip). >> >> This is good to hear, because patch 1/3 makes it look like >> the bus power does get immediately affected depending >> on that capability, isn't it? >> > no. > it checks pm_flags (configured pm features) rather than pm_caps > (supported pm features). I see. Thanks for the explanation. -- Regards, Igor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
